Geographical units of analysis and the analysis of crime

43Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When spatial analysis of crime is conducted, the analyst should not ignore the spatial units that data are aggregated into and the impact of this choice on the interpretation of findings. Just as several independent variables are considered to determine whether they have statistical significance, a consideration of multiple spatial units of analysis should be made as well, in order to determine whether the choice of aggregation level used in a spatial analysis can result in biased findings. This chapter considers four classes of problems that can arise when data bounded in space are analyzed. These problems, inherent in most studies of space, include: issues associated with politically bounded units of aggregation, edge effects of bounded space, the modifiable aerial unit problem (MAUP), and ways in which the results of statistical analyses can be manipulated by changes in the level of aggregation. Techniques that can be used to alleviate each of the methodological difficulties described in this chapter are then discussed. © 2009 Springer New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rengert, G. F., & Lockwood, B. (2009). Geographical units of analysis and the analysis of crime. In Putting Crime in its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology (pp. 109–122). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09688-9_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free