Drawing on insights from the epistemological work of the Jaina philosophers of classical India, I argue in defense of epistemic pluralism, the view that there are different but equally valid ways of knowing the world. The version of epistemic pluralism I defend is stance pluralism, a pluralism about epistemic stances or perspectives, understood to be policies or stratagems of knowing. I reject the view that the correct way to characterize epistemic pluralism is as consisting in a pluralism about epistemic systems.
CITATION STYLE
Ganeri, J. (2019). Epistemic Pluralism: From Systems to Stances. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.34
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.