Due to technological advances in the past two decades, researchers now have unprecedented access to a tremendous amount of useful information. However, because of the extreme pressure to publish, this abundance of information can sometimes tempt researchers to commit scientific misconduct. A serious form of such misconduct is plagiarism. Editors are always concerned about the possibility of publishing plagiarized manuscripts. The plagiarism detection tool CrossCheck allows editors to scan and analyze manuscripts effectively. The Journal of Epidemiology took part in a trial of CrossCheck, and this article discusses the concerns journal editors might have regarding the use of CrossCheck and its analysis. In addition, potential problems identified by CrossCheck, including self-plagiarism, are introduced.
CITATION STYLE
HASHIMOTO, K. (2012). CrossCheck plagiarism screening : Experience of the Journal of Epidemiology. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 55(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.55.87
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.