CrossCheck plagiarism screening : Experience of the Journal of Epidemiology

  • HASHIMOTO K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Due to technological advances in the past two decades, researchers now have unprecedented access to a tremendous amount of useful information. However, because of the extreme pressure to publish, this abundance of information can sometimes tempt researchers to commit scientific misconduct. A serious form of such misconduct is plagiarism. Editors are always concerned about the possibility of publishing plagiarized manuscripts. The plagiarism detection tool CrossCheck allows editors to scan and analyze manuscripts effectively. The Journal of Epidemiology took part in a trial of CrossCheck, and this article discusses the concerns journal editors might have regarding the use of CrossCheck and its analysis. In addition, potential problems identified by CrossCheck, including self-plagiarism, are introduced.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

HASHIMOTO, K. (2012). CrossCheck plagiarism screening : Experience of the Journal of Epidemiology. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 55(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.55.87

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free