The ‘Jorisards’: Public mobilization between local emotions and universal rights

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The imprisonment of Edward Joris in Istanbul engendered a form of mass-mobilization with strong reminiscences of-and close interconnections with-the Dreyfus affair in France. Having its roots in Joris’s hometown Antwerp, it quickly transformed into a national and even international forum by a small group of influential left wing journalists, intellectuals and politicians. While serving as a strong vehicle for the discourse of universal human rights as had been developing during former decades, this mobilization was also deeply influenced by emotional and particularistic responses. Nationalism and anti-Ottoman or Islamophobic prejudices-often verging on blatant racism-pervaded many pleas for the liberation of Joris. Apart from analyzing the actors, strategies and discourses involved in this mobilization, this chapter also situates it in the Belgian political context of the time. In so doing, it tries to understand why the Catholic government turned out to be very vulnerable to this left wing mobilization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beyen, M. (2017). The ‘Jorisards’: Public mobilization between local emotions and universal rights. In To Kill a Sultan: A Transnational History of the Attempt on Abdulhamid II (1905) (pp. 225–246). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48932-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free