Anesthetic considerations for robotic urologic surgery

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proper management of anesthesia for robotic-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery (RALUS) must focus on the complex physiology and implications of Pneumoperitoneum (PPT) and the Trendelenburg position (TP) which challenge the neurologic, ocular, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and renal systems. The type of inflation gas and degree of abdominal and hydrostatic pressure proportionally affect these systems, while restricted access to the limbs hinders routine monitoring, interpretation, venous access, and safety. The cardiovascular effects are profound, but generally well tolerated and hidden, whereas the management of ventilation becomes far more difficult. Special techniques for monitoring neuromuscular blockade (NMB), blood pressure (BP), and central venous pressure (CVP) are indicated. Pre-anesthetic evaluation, surgical positioning, drug effects, airway and fluid management, and recognition of common complications ought to inform the specific conduct of anesthesia, while the experience of the surgeon may have the most profound influence over the course of anesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olympio, M. A. (2018). Anesthetic considerations for robotic urologic surgery. In Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery, Second Edition (pp. 59–76). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free