Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

  • Fujimori T
  • Le H
  • Schairer W
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The author regrets an error in the Conclusion of the above article, published in the Global Spine Journal, Volume 5, Number 2, 2015 (DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396432). The word “reduction” was inadvertently omitted. The corrected Conclusion appears below. Conclusion The TLIF group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in low back pain and unilateral leg pain compared with the PLF group. However, no differences in improvement in either ODI or PCS were noted between the groups. The postoperative slippage reduction and disk height were significantly greater in the TLIF group, but local disk lordosis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic parameters were similar between the groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fujimori, T., Le, H., Schairer, W. W., Berven, S. H., Qamirani, E., & Hu, S. S. (2015). Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Have Advantages over Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis? Global Spine Journal, s-0035-1564569. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1564569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free