Why Reforms Are Needed in Bilateral Diplomacy: A Global South Perspective

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines the current limitations, especially in relation to bilateral and regional diplomacy, with examples drawn from large and small states: Australia, Brazil, India, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, and other countries. It covers foreign ministry-embassy relations; hierarchies and internal communications; innovation and how to shift it from a slogan to reality; the wiki method of collective learning; knowledge management; a “benefit of doubt” doctrine; improved management of the four pillars: political, economic, public, and consular diplomacy; the special role of advancing the country’s external economic objectives, especially in trade and FDI. Often reform falters at the stage of detailing the requirements, the role of the key players, and especially at implementation stage. Instead it needs to create a consensus in favor of reform, as well as public communication of objectives, which is part of a wider challenge that diplomatic systems face in gaining recognition for their role in national affairs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rana, K. S. (2023). Why Reforms Are Needed in Bilateral Diplomacy: A Global South Perspective. In Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations (pp. 81–108). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10971-3_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free