Der US-Supreme Court: Hüter der Verfassung oder Interpret der Gegenwart?

  • Dreyer M
  • Fröhlich N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Guth, Schmittberger and Schwarze’s (1982) ultimatum game result is replicated with mean earnings of £59.98 (N = 51) S.D. = £11.45, from a possible £80, and a linear relationship between offer size and acceptance rate. Results indicate a significant interaction effect between offer size and response, F(3, 31) = 3.69, p < 0.05 on response time. Our novel adjustment introduced the proposer’s most ‘common offer’ to responders. Results were in accord with prior work (Knez & Camerer, 1995); social comparisons between the participant, and a hypothesised responder – the receiver of the ‘common offer’ – were made only at mid-range offers (£2), for which low common offers were accepted more from proposers making low common offers than high t(45) = 3.28, p< 0.05.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dreyer, M., & Fröhlich, N. (2014). Der US-Supreme Court: Hüter der Verfassung oder Interpret der Gegenwart? In Handbuch Politik USA (pp. 1–20). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_11-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free