Faculty development for the evaluation system: A dual agenda

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Faculty development for the evaluation process serves two distinct goals. The first goal is to improve the quality of the evaluations submitted by the faculty. Providing an accurate assessment of a learner’s capabilities is a skill and, similar to other skills, can be developed with training. Frame-of-reference training serves to calibrate the faculty’s standard of performance and build a uniform language of the evaluation. Second, areas for faculty professional growth can be identified from data generated from learners’ evaluations of the faculty using narrative comments, item-level comparison reports, and comparative rank list information. This paper presents an innovative model, grounded in institutional experience and review of the literature, to provide feedback to faculty evaluators, thereby improving the reliability of the evaluation process, and motivating the professional growth of faculty as educators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oller, K. L., Mai, C. T., Ledford, R. J., & O’brien, K. E. (2017). Faculty development for the evaluation system: A dual agenda. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 8, 205–210. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S124004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free