Three-dimensional microstructural abnormality of the coronary capillary network after myocardial reperfusion - Comparison between 'reflow' and 'no-reflow'

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The 3-dimensional (D) structural abnormalities of the coronary capillary network and capillary volume changes after myocardial reperfusion were investigated using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Methods and Results: Using open-chest anesthetized rats' hearts, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was occluded for 7 min followed by reperfusion. The hearts were divided into 2 groups: (1) reperfused area stained well by intravenous indocyanine green after reperfusion (Reflow), and (2) lack of staining in the reperfused area (No-reflow). The entire coronary microvasculature was filled with contrast medium using a Langendorff s perfusion system. Capillaries were observed 3-dimensionally in the control and reperfused areas in both the Reflow and No-reflow group and the capillary volume fraction was computed from the 3-D images. The reperfused area in both groups showed decreased capillary diameter with waving and shrinkage configuration. In the No-reflow group, marked interruption of capillary network was observed. In the Reflow group the capillary volume fraction was significantly reduced in the reperfused area compared with the control area (14.8±4.1% vs 22.2±5.6%, p<0.05). Capillary volume fraction was further decreased in the No-reflow group compared with Reflow (5.3±1.4% vs 14.8±4.1%, p<0.01). Conclusion: The morphological changes in coronary capillaries after reperfusion were characterized by waving and shrinkage, which resulted in a reduction in capillary volume.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, N., Akasaka, T., Toyota, E., Fujimoto, K., Kajita, T., Shigeto, F., … Yoshida, K. (2004). Three-dimensional microstructural abnormality of the coronary capillary network after myocardial reperfusion - Comparison between “reflow” and “no-reflow.” Circulation Journal, 68(9), 868–872. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.68.868

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free