Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation?

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For decades, unfractionated heparin (hereafter, heparin) has been the primary anticoagulant used for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. More recently, however, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has emerged as an alternative. This systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to summarize 16 comparative studies and 8 meta-analysis and review articles published from January, 2011 till May, 2023 which directly compares ECMO courses using heparin versus bivalirudin as the anticoagulant. While this comparison is complicated by the lack of a standardized definition of major bleeding or thrombosis, our overall findings suggest there is no statistical difference between heparin and bivalirudin in incidence of bleeding and thrombosis. That said, some studies found a statistical significance favoring bivalirudin in reducing major bleeding, thrombosis, and the need for transfusions. We also offer essential guidance for appropriately selecting an anticoagulant and monitoring its effect in ECMO settings.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Navaei, A., Kostousov, V., & Teruya, J. (2023). Is it time to switch to bivalirudin for ECMO anticoagulation? Frontiers in Medicine. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1237601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free