Plagiarism and Double Publication

  • Eismann M
1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Like many of you, I was introduced to the ethics of plagiarism in elementary school, and instruction about what constitutes plagiarism was reinforced throughout my education. There- fore, I was surprised as I started my tenure as Editor of this journal to discover that a fair amount of time would be spent handling issues related to plagiarism and double publication. The SPIE policy concerning plagiarism is clear: SPIE defines plagiarism as the reuse of someone else’s prior ideas, processes, results, or words without explicit attribution of the original author and source. Unauthor- ized use of another researcher’s unpublished data or findings without permission is considered to be a form of plagiarism even if the source is attributed. SPIE con- siders plagiarism in any form, at any level, to be unac- ceptable and a serious breach of professional conduct. In

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eismann, M. T. (2015). Plagiarism and Double Publication. Optical Engineering, 54(3), 030101. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.54.3.030101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free