A reframe by any other name: on the process of refraining in strategic, Milan and analytic therapy

18Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper explores the process of reframing within strategic, Milan and analytic therapy. There are two purposes in exploring the different frameworks – the first is to clarify the differences in each framework; the second is to examine reframing as a generic process in therapy. In the course of the discussion, some common themes emerge. These include the question of the client's experience of therapy, the tendency to depersonalize the process of reframing, and the issue of truth in relation to reframing. Throughout the paper, there is an attempt to avoid the tendency in family therapy to treat difference competitively. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Attribution retraining in forgiveness therapy

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relational reframe and parent's problem constructions in attachment-based family therapy

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Humor, Joining, and Reframing in Psychotherapy: Resolving the Auto-Double-Bind

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flaskas, C. (1992). A reframe by any other name: on the process of refraining in strategic, Milan and analytic therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 14(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1046/j..1992.00448.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

78%

Researcher 3

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 23

74%

Social Sciences 5

16%

Arts and Humanities 2

6%

Philosophy 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free