Technological delegation: Responsibility for the unintended

26Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article defends three interconnected premises that together demand for a new way of dealing with moral responsibility in developing and using technological artifacts. The first premise is that humans increasingly make use of dissociated technological delegation. Second, because technologies do not simply fulfill our actions, but rather mediate them, the initial aims alter and outcomes are often different from those intended. Third, since the outcomes are often unforeseen and unintended, we can no longer simply apply the traditional (modernist) models for discussing moral responsibility. We need to reinterpret moral responsibility. A schematic layout of a model on Social Role-Responsibility that incorporates these three premises is presented to allow discussion of a new way of interpreting moral responsibility. © 2008 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Waelbers, K. (2009). Technological delegation: Responsibility for the unintended. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free