Testing the metacognitive model against the benchmark CBT model of social anxiety disorder: Is it time to move beyond cognition?

17Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recommended treatment for Social Phobia is individual Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT). CBT-Treatments emphasize social self-beliefs (schemas) as the core underlying factor for maladaptive self-processing and social anxiety symptoms. However, the need for such beliefs in models of psychopathology has recently been questioned. Specifically, the metacognitive model of psychological disorders asserts that particular beliefs about thinking (metacognitive beliefs) are involved in most disorders, including social anxiety, and are a more important factor underlying pathology. Comparing the relative importance of these disparate underlying belief systems has the potential to advance conceptualization and treatment for SAD. In the cognitive model, unhelpful self-regulatory processes (self-Attention and safety behaviours) arise from (e.g. correlate with) cognitive beliefs (schemas) whilst the metacognitive model proposes that such processes arise from metacognitive beliefs. In the present study we therefore set out to evaluate the absolute and relative fit of the cognitive and metacognitive models in a longitudinal data-set, using structural equation modelling. Five-hundred and five (505) participants completed a battery of self-report questionnaires at two time points approximately 8 weeks apart. We found that both models fitted the data, but that the metacognitive model was a better fit to the data than the cognitive model. Further, a specified metacognitive model, emphasising negative metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts and cognitive confidence improved the model fit further and was significantly better than the cognitive model. It would seem that advances in understanding and treating social anxiety could benefit from moving to a full metacognitive theory that includes negative metacognitive beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thoughts, and judgements of cognitive confidence. These findings challenge a core assumption of the cognitive model and treatment of social phobia and offer further support to the metacognitive model.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78834Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification

41017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factor analysis and AIC

4750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Breaking the Cybernetic Code: Understanding and Treating the Human Metacognitive Control System to Enhance Mental Health

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anxiety and the dynamic self as defined by the prospection and mental simulation of looming future threats

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maladaptive Self-Beliefs During Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Test of Temporal Precedence

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nordahl, H., & Wells, A. (2017). Testing the metacognitive model against the benchmark CBT model of social anxiety disorder: Is it time to move beyond cognition? PLoS ONE, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177109

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

73%

Researcher 10

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 49

82%

Social Sciences 5

8%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

7%

Philosophy 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 70

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free