Is "as good as face-to-face" as good as it gets?

61Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We are constantly being asked to compare distance education to traditional education. But by striving to make distance education "as good as" face-to-face education what are we overlooking or sacrificing? In this paper we explore these issues by first reviewing background information from the literature about new teaching theories, methods and technology. We'll also look at the impact of online learning and whether it can support, or even expand, the new teaching theories and strategies, based on research. We'll then get a general overview of quality distance education principles and guidelines currently in use, finally addressing the question of whether our evaluation methods and questions serve to free or limit the potential of online learning, perpetuating "doing things differently or doing different things" [1].

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McDonald, J. (2002, August). Is “as good as face-to-face” as good as it gets? Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i2.1866

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free