Determinacy and rewriting of conjunctive queries using views: A progress report

21Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Suppose we are given a set of exact conjunctive views V and a conjunctive query Q. Suppose we wish to answer Q using V, but the classical test for the existence of a conjunctive rewriting of Q using V answers negatively. What can we conclude: (i) there is no way Q can be answered using V, or (ii) a more powerful rewriting language may be needed. This has been an open question, with conventional wisdom favoring (i). Surprisingly, we show that the right answer is actually (ii). That is, even if V provides enough information to answer Q, it may not be possible to rewrite Q in terms of V using just conjunctive queries - in fact, no monotonic language is sufficiently powerful. We also exhibit several well-behaved classes of conjunctive views and queries for which conjunctive rewritings remain sufficient. This continues a previous investigation of rewriting and its connection to semantic determinacy, for various query and view languages. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nash, A., Segoufin, L., & Vianu, V. (2006). Determinacy and rewriting of conjunctive queries using views: A progress report. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4353 LNCS, pp. 59–73). https://doi.org/10.1007/11965893_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free