Teaching and evaluating professionalism

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although professionalism is one of the six Core Competencies in Graduate Medical Education, no "gold-standard" definition exists. Instead, different conceptual frameworks such as the Professional Identity Formation model (Boudreau et al., Acad, Med., 90:718-725, 2015) may be used during psychiatric residency education. Professionalism teaching content includes principles from these models as well as codes of ethics and legal requirements. These all need to be taught during psychiatric residency training both explicitly and implicitly through didactic curricula, clinical rotations, faculty role modeling, facilitated reflection, and the culture of the clinical learning environment (CLE), all of which are ideally aligned in their content and philosophy. Assessing professionalism and monitoring for lapses requires multimodal, ongoing feedback throughout all aspects of the training program; specific evaluation instruments are available. New frontiers in professionalism in psychiatric education include clarifying the developmental stages of professionalism, integrating culture and structural racism concerns into professionalism concepts, defining individual and group well-being responsibilities, using emerging clinical knowledge as learning grounds for professionalism, and demonstrating the impact of professionalism on improving patient care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeJong, S. M. (2022). Teaching and evaluating professionalism. In Graduate Medical Education in Psychiatry: From Basic Processes to True Innovation (pp. 215–230). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00836-8_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free