ProsCan for Couples: A feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design

22Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background The present study assessed the feasibility of delivering peer support for couples coping with prostate cancer within a trial design. Methods/Design Ten peer volunteers completed training in research protocols and delivering tele-based couples support to men with prostate cancer and their partners. Twenty couples received an eight session intervention and were assessed before surgery and 3 and 6 months subsequently for adjustment outcomes. A focus group investigated the peers' experiences. Results Peers were motivated by altruism, a belief in research, and reported personal growth. The research protocol at times conflicted with lay models of helping, and the focus on sexuality and couples was challenging. Distress decreased over time but more so for partners; unmet sexuality needs did not improve. Conclusion Peer support appears promising as a model to support couples facing prostate cancer. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chambers, S. K., Schover, L., Halford, K., Ferguson, M., Gardiner, R. A., Occhipinti, S., & Dunn, J. (2013). ProsCan for Couples: A feasibility study for evaluating peer support within a controlled research design. Psycho-Oncology, 22(2), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free