Selecting information diffusion models over social networks for behavioral analysis

81Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate how well different information diffusion models can explain observation data by learning their parameters and discuss which model is better suited to which topic. We use two models (AsIC, AsLT), each of which is an extension of the well known Independent Cascade (IC) and Linear Threshold (LT) models and incorporates asynchronous time delay. The model parameters are learned by maximizing the likelihood of observation, and the model selection is performed by choosing the one with better predictive accuracy. We first show by using four real networks that the proposed learning algorithm correctly learns the model parameters both accurately and stably, and the proposed selection method identifies the correct diffusion model from which the data are generated. We next apply these methods to behavioral analysis of topic propagation using the real blog propagation data, and show that although the relative propagation speed of topics that are derived from the learned parameter values is rather insensitive to the model selected, there is a clear indication as to which topic better follows which model. The correspondence between the topic and the model selected is well interpretable. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

14462Citations
5390Readers
Get full text

Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network

6846Citations
896Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saito, K., Kimura, M., Ohara, K., & Motoda, H. (2010). Selecting information diffusion models over social networks for behavioral analysis. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6323 LNAI, pp. 180–195). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15939-8_12

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

80%

Researcher 9

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 53

76%

Social Sciences 7

10%

Engineering 7

10%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0