Factors Associated With Patient Involvement in Emergency Care Decisions: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial

6Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Shared decision making in the emergency department (ED) can increase patient engagement for patients presenting with chest pain. However, little is known regarding which factors are associated with actual patient involvement in decision making or patients’ desired involvement in emergency care decisions. We examined which factors were associated with patients’ actual and desired involvement in decision making among ED chest pain patients. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention in ED patients with low-risk chest pain. We evaluated the degree to which patients were involved in decision making using the OPTION-12 (observing patient involvement) scale and patients’ reported desire for involvement in decision making using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). We measured the associations of patient factors with OPTION-12 and CPS scores using multivariable regression. Results: Of the 898 patients enrolled, mean (±SD) age was 51.5 (±11.4) years and 59% were female. Multivariable analysis revealed that only two factors were significantly associated with OPTION-12 scores: study site and use of the decision aid. OPTION-12 scores were 10.3 (standard error = 0.6) points higher for patients randomized to the decision aid compared to usual care (p < 0.001). Higher health literacy was associated with lower scores on the CPS, indicating greater desire for involvement (odds ratio = 0.91, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients’ reported desire for involvement in decision making was higher among those with higher health literacy. After study site and other potential confounding factors were adjusted for, only use of the decision aid was associated with observed patient involvement in decision making. As the science and practice of shared decision making in the ED moves toward implementation, high-fidelity integration of the decision aid into the flow of care will be necessary to realize desired outcomes.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60536Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials

3027Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Where is the evidence? a systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes

852Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Short communication: Opportunities and challenges for early person-centered care for older patients in emergency settings

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of barriers, facilitators, and tools to promote shared decision making in the emergency department

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Probst, M. A., Tschatscher, C. F., Lohse, C. M., Fernanda Bellolio, M., & Hess, E. P. (2018). Factors Associated With Patient Involvement in Emergency Care Decisions: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(10), 1107–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13503

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

61%

Researcher 7

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

28%

Social Sciences 5

16%

Engineering 3

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free