Functional outcome estimation of calcaneum fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws in a tertiary centre: A descriptive cross-sectional study

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Calcaneum fractures constitute about 60% of all tarsal bone fractures. Intra-articular fractures account for 70% of all calcaneal fractures. There are controversies regarding the operative treatment of calcaneum fractures. Therefore this study aimed to estimate the functional outcomes of calcaneum fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out at the tertiary care center in the western region of Nepal among the patients with displaced intra-articular calcaneum fractures from February 2017 to July 2020 after approval from the Institutional review committee. Convenient sampling was done to reach the sample size. Fifteen cases were included in the study. Data were recorded in proforma and Data analysis was done in the statistical package for social sciences. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score was used to assess the final outcome. Results: According to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot scores, there were five excellent (33.33%), seven good (46.66%), two fair (13.33%) and one poor (6.66 %) results. Conclusions: In displaced intra-articular calcaneum fractures, open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws result in a good number of satisfactory outcomes with very few unsatisfactory results. Hence it can be a better option of treatment in displaced intra-articular calcaneum fractures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dwivedi, R., Khatri, M., & Arjun, K. C. (2020). Functional outcome estimation of calcaneum fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws in a tertiary centre: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 58(229), 659–663. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free