The passage of time may affect the balance of the interests involved in the processing of personal data. In particular it may have an impact on the trade-off between publicity interests and privacy interests with regard to information made available online. Changes in this trade-off may justify a transition in the legal status of the same piece of information: what was legitimately distributed at an earlier time may no longer be legitimately provided to the public at a later time. This idea is at the core of the so-called “right to be forgotten”, namely, the data subject’s right to obtain, at a later time, the erasure of personal information that originally was legitimately processed. This right has been endorsed in a number of judicial decisions in various EU member states, and has been explicitly affirmed in the Proposal for a General Data Protection Regulation, presented by the EU commission in 2012. Here I propose a method for modelling the evolution of the privacy and publicity interests through time, and for assessing the impacts of a discipline of the right to be forgotten on the online distribution of information. I will distinguish different trends in the trade-offs between privacy and publicity, and more generally between the interests that would be promoted by a certain processing and those that would be demoted by it. I will argue that in cases where there is a reversal-time, mainly a time when the first interests, originally prevailing, are outweighed by the latter, the law may direct controllers (or processors) to stop or change the processing around that time, and I will consider ways of achieving this outcome.
CITATION STYLE
Sartor, G. (2014). The Right to be Forgotten: Dynamics of Privacy and Publicity. In Law, Governance and Technology Series (Vol. 17, pp. 1–15). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0_1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.