Re-thinking Complexity in the Critical Care Environment

  • Kannampallil T
  • Cohen T
  • Kaufman D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The term ``complexity'' is used to define tasks or systems ranging from complicated to intractable, and to generally mean ``not simple.'' As noted by a Nobel laureate Murray Gell-Mann, ``a variety of different measures would be required to capture all our intuitive ideas about what is meant by complexity and by its opposite, simplicity'' [1]. But, it is generally acknowledged that complexity is context-dependent [2], and subjective [1]. While the implications for complexity has been discussed within the context of several settings [3--8], some of these discussions have been met with skepticism (e.g., [9, 10]), provoking responses that the key ideas of complexity theory used in healthcare are often distorted ideas, ``trotted out in the guise of complexity'' [9], and are merely the ``emperor's new toolkit'' [10].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kannampallil, T. G., Cohen, T., Kaufman, D. R., & Patel, V. L. (2014). Re-thinking Complexity in the Critical Care Environment (pp. 343–355). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5490-7_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free