Dipolar and non-dipolar dynamos in a thin shell geometry with implications for the magnetic field of Mercury

49Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Dynamo action possibly working in the fluid core of Mercury is examined using numerical models in a thin spherical shell. Dipolar (DP) dynamos are obtained in the regime of columnar flows outside the tangent cylinder (TC), whereas non-dipolar (NDP) dynamos dominated by the multipole components are found in the regime of flows both inside and outside the TC. It turns out that columnar-like convective motions not only outside but also inside the TC are responsible for the NDP dynamo. The electrically conducting inner core enhances the strength of large-scale magnetic field, but predominance of the NDP components remains due to the thin shell geometry. These results suggest that Mercury may have more complicated magnetic field than has been considered. Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.

References Powered by Scopus

Magnetism and thermal evolution of the terrestrial planets

540Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Planetary magnetic fields

281Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Numerical modeling of the geodynamo: Mechanisms of field generation and equilibration

269Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dipole moment scaling for convection-driven planetary dynamos

229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A deep dynamo generating Mercury's magnetic field

206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Low-degree structure in Mercury's planetary magnetic field

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Takahashi, F., & Matsushima, M. (2006). Dipolar and non-dipolar dynamos in a thin shell geometry with implications for the magnetic field of Mercury. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025792

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 9

56%

Physics and Astronomy 6

38%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free