Fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics in healthy elderly subjects and elderly patients with chronic heart failure

25Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effects of age and chronic heart failure (CHF) on the oral disposition kinetics of fluvoxamine. Methods: A single fluvoxamine dose (50 mg) was administered orally to 10 healthy young adults, 10 healthy elderly subjects and 10 elderly patients with CHF. Fluvoxamine concentration in plasma was measured for up to 96 h. Results: With the exception of apparent distribution volume, ageing modified all main pharmacokinetic parameters of fluvoxamine. Thus, peak concentration was about doubled {31 ± 19 vs. 15 ± 9 ng ml-1; difference 95% confidence interval (CI) 16 (3, 29), P < 0.05}, and area under the concentration-time curve was almost three times higher 885 ± 560 vs. 304 ± 84 ng h ml-1; difference (95% CI) 581 (205, 957), P < 0.05; half-life was prolonged by 63% 21.1 ± 6.2 vs. 12.9 ± 6.4 h; difference (95% CI) 8.2 (2.3, 14.1), P < 0.01, and oral clearance was halved (1.12 ± 0.77 vs. 2.25 ± 0.66 l h-1 kg-1; difference (95% CI) -1.13 (-1.80, -0.46), P < 0.001. A significant inverse correlation was consistently observed between age and oral clearance (r = -0.67; P < 0.001). The coexistence of CHF had no significant effect on any pharmacokinetic parameters in elderly subjects. Conclusions: Ageing results in considerable impairment of fluvoxamine disposition, whereas CHF causes no significant modifications. Therefore, adjustment of initial dose and subsequent dose titrations may be required in elderly subjects, whereas no further dose reduction is necessary in elderly patients with CHF. © 2010 The British Pharmacological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Orlando, R., De Martin, S., Andrighetto, L., Floreani, M., & Palatini, P. (2010). Fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics in healthy elderly subjects and elderly patients with chronic heart failure. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 69(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03587.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free