A false negative study of the steganalysis tool stegdetect

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated one of the modern automated steganalysis tools, Stegdetect, to study its false negative rates when analysing a bulk of images. In so doing, we used JPHide method to embed a randomly generated messages into 2000 JPEG images. The aim of this study is to help digital forensics analysts during their investigations by means of providing an idea of the false negative rates of Stegdetect. This study found that (1) the false negative rates depended largely on the tool’s sensitivity values, (2) the tool had a high false negative rate between the sensitivity values from 0.1 to 3.4 and (3) the best sensitivity value for detection of JPHide method was 6.2. It is therefore recommended that when analysing a huge bulk of images forensic analysts need to take into consideration sensitivity values to reduce the false negative rates of Stegdetect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aziz, B., Jung, J., Lee, J., & Chun, Y. T. (2020). A false negative study of the steganalysis tool stegdetect. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(22), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free