Conspiracy Theories and Their Vicissitudes

  • Byford J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article aims to reinvigorate analytical debates on conspiracy theories. It argues that definitional attempts to set conspiracy theories apart from other theories are flawed. Blinded by the "irrational" reputation of conspiracy theories and deluded by the workings of institutionalized power such approaches fail to recognize that there are no inherent differences between the two categories. We argue that assessments of conspiracy theories should focus not on the epistemological qualities of these theories but on their interactions with the socio-political fields through which they travel. Because "conspiracy theory" is not a neutral term but a powerful label, attention to processes of labeling highlights these larger fields of power, while the theories' trajectories illuminate the mechanisms by which truth and untruth are created. As such, this article offers a way forward for assessing both the truth and use value of conspiracy theories in the contemporary world.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy Theories and Their Vicissitudes. In Conspiracy Theories (pp. 38–70). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230349216_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free