Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants

49Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare operative duration and total hospital costs incurred for patients undergoing elective cranioplasty with a variety of materials, including manually shaped autogenous bone graft and titanium mesh, custom patient-specific titanium mesh, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) acrylic, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants. Methods: A single-centre retrospective chart review was used. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, total operative time, and length of hospital stay were obtained. Total costs were sourced from Sunnybrook and standardized to the 2014 to 2015 year. Bivariate and age-controlled multivariate analyses were performed with (n = 119) and without (n = 101) outliers. Results: When outliers were removed, an age-controlled analysis revealed that autogenous implants resulted in an operative time of 178 ± 37 minutes longer than manually shaped titanium implants (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Binhammer, A., Jakubowski, J., Antonyshyn, O., & Binhammer, P. (2020). Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants. Plastic Surgery, 28(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550319880922

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free