Comparing Nasopharyngeal and Midturbinate Nasal Swab Testing for the Identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

40Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Testing of paired midturbinate (MT) nasal and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, collected by trained personnel from 40 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), showed that more NP (76/95 [80%]) than MT swabs tested positive (61/95 [64%]) (P =. 02). Among samples collected a week after study enrollment, fewer MT than NP samples were positive (45% vs 76%; P =. 001).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pinninti, S., Trieu, C., Pati, S. K., Latting, M., Cooper, J., Seleme, M. C., … Boppana, S. B. (2021). Comparing Nasopharyngeal and Midturbinate Nasal Swab Testing for the Identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(7), 1253–1255. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa882

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free