Ovarian Stem Cells–-the Pros and Cons

  • Evron A
  • Blumenfeld Z
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The potential for postnatal de novo oogenesis in mammals and in humans has become very controversial in the fields of reproductive science and biology.Historically, it has been thought that females of most mammalian species lose the ability to produce oocytes at birth. A contemporary understanding of stem cell biology together with novel experimental methods has challenged the model of a prenatal fixed ovarian primordial follicle pool that declines with age. Researchers have suggested replenishment of post-natal oocytes by germ-line stem cells (GSCs). According to this theory, GSCs produce oocytes and primordial follicles throughout the lifetime of the adult female.This review describes recent approaches supporting the revolutionary idea of de novo oogenesis in mammals and humans of reproductive-age and provides counter arguments from opponents of this novel and innovative concept.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evron, A., & Blumenfeld, Z. (2013). Ovarian Stem Cells–-the Pros and Cons. Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health, 7, CMRH.S11086. https://doi.org/10.4137/cmrh.s11086

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Researcher 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

44%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0