The Effect of Gender on Interruptions at Congressional Hearings

4Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Women in Congress are highly effective legislators. Yet, if women are more likely than men to be interrupted during committee work, they may face a gender-related impediment. We examine speech patterns during more than 24,000 congressional committee hearings from 1994 to 2018 to determine whether women Members are more likely to be interrupted than men. We find that they are. This is especially true in Senate committees - where women are about 10% more likely to be interrupted. Furthermore, in hearings that discuss women's issues, women are more than twice as likely to be interrupted than while discussing other issues. We see a similar pattern for rapid-fire interruption clusters, an aggressive form of interruption. We further consider a range of moderating factors, which yields little evidence that women change their communication strategy as they gain experience in Congress. We also find suggestive evidence that interruptions are driven by mixed-gender interactions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, M. G., & Sutherland, J. L. (2023). The Effect of Gender on Interruptions at Congressional Hearings. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free