Linguistically regularized LSTM for sentiment classification

148Citations
Citations of this article
297Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper deals with sentence-level sentiment classification. Though a variety of neural network models have been proposed recently, however, previous models either depend on expensive phrase-level annotation, most of which has remarkably degraded performance when trained with only sentence-level annotation; or do not fully employ linguistic resources (e.g., sentiment lexicons, negation words, intensity words). In this paper, we propose simple models trained with sentence-level annotation, but also attempt to model the linguistic role of sentiment lexicons, negation words, and intensity words. Results show that our models are able to capture the linguistic role of sentiment words, negation words, and intensity words in sentiment expression.

References Powered by Scopus

Long Short-Term Memory

76938Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GloVe: Global vectors for word representation

26881Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation

11648Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep learning for sentiment analysis: A survey

1365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on Long Short-term memory networks

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bidirectional LSTM with self-attention mechanism and multi-channel features for sentiment classification

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qian, Q., Huang, M., Lei, J., & Zhu, X. (2017). Linguistically regularized LSTM for sentiment classification. In ACL 2017 - 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference (Long Papers) (Vol. 1, pp. 1679–1689). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1154

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 151

83%

Researcher 23

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 170

87%

Engineering 13

7%

Linguistics 7

4%

Social Sciences 5

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free