KRAS status is related to histological phenotype in gastric cancer: results from a large multicentre study

19Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is histologically a very heterogeneous disease, and the temporal development of different histological phenotypes remains unclear. Recent studies in lung and ovarian cancer suggest that KRAS activation (KRASact) can influence histological phenotype. KRASact likely results from KRAS mutation (KRASmut) or KRAS amplification (KRASamp). The aim of the study was to investigate whether KRASmut and/or KRASamp are related to the histological phenotype in GC. Methods: Digitized haematoxylin/eosin-stained slides from 1282 GC resection specimens were classified according to Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the Lauren classification by at least two observers. The relationship between KRAS status, predominant histological phenotype and clinicopathological variables was assessed. Results: KRASmut and KRASamp were found in 68 (5%) and 47 (7%) GCs, respectively. Within the KRASmut and KRASamp cases, the most frequent GC histological phenotype was moderately differentiated tubular 2 (tub2) type (KRASmut: n = 27, 40%; KRASamp: n = 21, 46%) or intestinal type (KRASmut: n = 41, 61%; KRASamp: n = 23, 50%). Comparing individual histological subtypes, mucinous carcinoma displayed the highest frequency of KRASmut (JGCA: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.012; Lauren: n = 6, 12%, p = 0.013), and KRASamp was more frequently found in poorly differentiated solid type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.267) or indeterminate type (n = 12, 10%, p = 0.480) GC. 724 GCs (57%) had intratumour morphological heterogeneity. Conclusions: This is the largest GC study investigating KRAS status and histological phenotype. We identified a relationship between KRASmut and mucinous phenotype. The high level of intratumour morphological heterogeneity could reflect KRASmut heterogeneity, which may explain the failure of anti-EGFR therapy in GC.

References Powered by Scopus

THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

5508Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma

4978Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition

3129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Helicobacter pylori–induced RASAL2 Through Activation of Nuclear Factor-κB Promotes Gastric Tumorigenesis via β-catenin Signaling Axis

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalizable biomarker prediction from cancer pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning: A retrospective multi-centric study

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial profiling of gastric cancer patient-matched primary and locoregional metastases reveals principles of tumour dissemination

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hewitt, L. C., Saito, Y., Wang, T., Matsuda, Y., Oosting, J., Silva, A. N. S., … Grabsch, H. I. (2019). KRAS status is related to histological phenotype in gastric cancer: results from a large multicentre study. Gastric Cancer, 22(6), 1193–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00972-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

41%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

24%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

39%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

33%

Engineering 3

17%

Chemistry 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free