18 F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

54Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: This meta-analysis aims to establish the diagnostic performance of 18 F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. The performance of 18 F-NaF-PET/CT was compared with other imaging techniques in the same cohort of patients. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed/Medline and EMBASE (last Updated, September 28, 2018). Studies with histopathology confirmation and/or clinical/imaging follow-up as reference standard were eligible for inclusion. Results: A total of 14 studies were included. Twelve studies including 507 patients provided per-patient basis information. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 18 F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–0.99), 0.90 (95% CI 0.86–0.93), 123.2 and 0.97, respectively. Seven studies provided the lesion-based accuracy information of 1812 lesions identified on 18 F-NaF-PET/CT with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), 0.84 (95% CI 0.81–0.87), 206.8 and 0.97, respectively. The overall diagnostic performance of 18 F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to 99m Tc-bone scintigraphy (AUC 0.842; P < 0.001; four studies) and 99m Tc-SPECT (AUC 0.896; P < 0.001, four studies). Compared to 18 F NaF-PET/CT, whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was shown to have lower sensitivity (0.83, 95% CI 0.68–0.93), with no significant difference in the overall performance (AUC 0.947; P = 0.18, four studies). Conclusion: 18 F-NaF-PET/CT has excellent diagnostic performance in the detection of bone metastases in staging and restaging of high-risk prostate cancer patients. The performance of 18 F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to 99m Tc bone scintigraphy and SPECT, and comparable to DWI–MRI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheikhbahaei, S., Jones, K. M., Werner, R. A., Salas-Fragomeni, R. A., Marcus, C. V., Higuchi, T., … Javadi, M. S. (2019). 18 F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-019-01343-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free