Concept graphs without negations: Standard models and standard graphs

6Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, we provide different possibilities for doing reasoning on simple concept(ual) graphs without negations or nestings. First of all, we have on the graphs the usual semantical entailment relation |=, and we consider the restriction ⊩ of the calculus for concept graph with cuts, which has been introduced in [Da02], to the system of concept graphs without cuts. Secondly, we introduce a semantical entailment relation |= as well as syntactical transformation rules ⊩ between models. Finally, we provide definitions for standard graphs and standard models so that we translate graphs to models and vice versa. Together with the relations |= and ⊩ on the graphs and on the models, we show that both calculi are adequate and that reasoning can be carried over from graphs to models and vice versa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dau, F. (2003). Concept graphs without negations: Standard models and standard graphs. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 2746, pp. 243–256). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45091-7_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free