Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: Performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry

58Citations
Citations of this article
184Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a common geriatric syndrome associated with serious adverse health outcomes. The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) suggests different methods for case finding for sarcopenia. However, data comparing the different methodological options are scarce for geriatric inpatients. Methods: On the basis of the recommendations of the EWGSOP sixty geriatric inpatients underwent measurement of gait speed, hand grip strength and muscle mass by both, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BIA). By linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots muscle mass measurements of DXA and BIA were compared. Outcomes of the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass and sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP case finding algorithm were compared by raw agreement and kappa statistics. Finally, on the hypothetical assumption that the DXA-based approach can be set as reference, the performance of the BIA-based approach is illustrated. Results: Muscle mass measured by BIA was highly correlated to DXA (r > 0.9), but BIA systematically overestimated muscle mass. The mean difference between DXA and BIA was -1.30 kg (p < 0.001) for appendicular and -2.33 kg (p < 0.001) for total muscle mass. The raw agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches for classifying participants as having normal or reduced muscle mass was at best 80 % depending on the BIA cut-offs used. Functional prescreening according to the sarcopenia case finding algorithm of the EWGSOP reduced the need for muscle mass measurement by 37 %, but only marginally changed the agreement between the DXA- and BIA-based approaches. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware that in geriatric inpatients the BIA-based approaches resulted in highly different subgroups of sarcopenic/non-sarcopenic subjects compared to the DXA-based approach following the EWGSOP case finding algorithm. In this pilot-study the BIA-based approach misclassified nearly 1 out of 6 patients if the DXA-based approach is taken as reference.

References Powered by Scopus

Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis

9196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico

3139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bioelectrical impedance analysis - Part I: Review of principles and methods

2264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis

8171Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): Screening, Diagnosis and Management

673Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management

553Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reiss, J., Iglseder, B., Kreutzer, M., Weilbuchner, I., Treschnitzer, W., Kässmann, H., … Reiter, R. (2016). Case finding for sarcopenia in geriatric inpatients: Performance of bioimpedance analysis in comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. BMC Geriatrics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0228-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 66

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

9%

Researcher 8

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 58

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 18

21%

Sports and Recreations 6

7%

Design 5

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 800

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free