Self-reported smoking status and plasma cotinine concentrations among pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study

114Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Underreporting of smoking in epidemiologic studies is common and may constitute a validity problem, leading to biased association measures. In this prospective study, we validated self-reported tobacco use against nicotine exposure assessed by plasma cotinine in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Methods: The study was based on a subsample of 2,997 women in the MoBa study who delivered infants during the period 2002-2003. Self-reported tobacco use (test variable) and plasma cotinine concentrations (gold standard) were assessed at approximately gestational week 18. Results: Daily smoking was reported by 9% of the women, occasional smoking by 4%, and nonsmoking by 86% of the women. Sensitivity and specificity for self-reported smoking status were calculated using a cotinine cut-off estimated from the study population (30 nmol/l). Plasma cotinine concentrations ≥30 nmol/l were found in 94% of self-reported daily smokers, 66% of occasional smokers, and 2% of nonsmokers. After the numbers of self-reported nonsmokers with cotinine concentrations above the cut-off limit were added, the daily smoking prevalence increased from 9 to 11%. The sensitivity and specificity for self-reported daily smoking, using 30 nmol/l as the cut-off concentration, were 82 and 99%, respectively. Discussion: These findings suggest that self-reported tobacco use is a valid marker for tobacco exposure in the MoBa cohort. Copyright © 2012 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kvalvik, L. G., Nilsen, R. M., Skjærven, R., Vollset, S. E., Midttun, Ø., Ueland, P. M., & Haug, K. (2012). Self-reported smoking status and plasma cotinine concentrations among pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. Pediatric Research, 72(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2012.36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free