In search of the new engineer: gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education

43Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is widely argued that engineering education needs to change in order to attract new groups of students and provide students with knowledge appropriate for the future society. In this paper we, therefore, investigate and analyse Swedish universities’ websites, focusing on what characteristics are brought to the fore as important for tomorrow’s engineers. The data consist of text and pictures/photos from nine different Engineering Mechanics programme websites. Using a critical discourse analysis approach, we identify three societal discourses concerning ‘technological progression’, ‘sustainability’, and ‘neoliberal ideals’, evident in the websites. These discourses make certain engineering identities possible, that we have labelled: traditional, contemporary, responsible, and self-made engineer. Our analysis shows that universities’ efforts to diversify students’ participation in engineering education simultaneously reveal stereotypical norms concerning gender and age. We also argue that strong neoliberal notions about the self-made engineer can derail awareness of a gendered, classed, and racialized society.

References Powered by Scopus

2228Citations
1968Readers
Get full text
Get full text
1161Citations
1056Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berge, M., Silfver, E., & Danielsson, A. (2019). In search of the new engineer: gender, age, and social class in information about engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 650–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1523133

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

58%

Lecturer / Post doc 11

19%

Researcher 9

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 25

47%

Engineering 20

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

9%

Psychology 3

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 100

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0