Influence of metal artifacts on in vivo micro-CT for orthodontic mini-implants.

9Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to show the effects of metal artifacts on the in vivo micro-CT of mini-implants by measuring bone volume. We drilled a hole in the cortical bone of a rat tibia and embedded a titanium orthodontic mini-implant (diameter, 1.5 mm) in the hole. Twelve individually weighed hydroxyapatite grains (HA grains) were placed around the implant either by one dentist (method 1) or separately by 12 dentists (method 2). In vivo micro-CT was used to scan the model after placement of each grain to measure increases and decreases in bone volume voxel number. The subtracted bone voxel volume increased with HA weight in both methods. Simple linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between weight and volume in both methods (method 1: regression coefficient: 516.502, P < 0.05; method 2: regression coefficient: 4837.432, P < 0.05). Metal artifacts did not appear to influence measurements of bone volume, although further studies are required to determine the effect of thicker implants.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mercury porosimetry as a tool for improving quality of micro-CT images in low porosity carbonate rocks

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3D X-ray micro-computed tomography imaging for the microarchitecture evaluation of porous metallic implants and scaffolds

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative study of new bone formation capability of zirconia bone graft material in rabbit calvarial

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ejima, K. ichiro, Omasa, S., Motoyoshi, M., Arai, Y., Kai, Y., Amemiya, T., … Shimizu, N. (2012). Influence of metal artifacts on in vivo micro-CT for orthodontic mini-implants. Journal of Oral Science, 54(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.54.55

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Researcher 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

59%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

27%

Engineering 2

9%

Materials Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0