Recognizing freeform digital ink annotations

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Annotations on digital documents have clear advantages over annotations on paper. They can be archived, shared, searched, and easily manipulated. Freeform digital ink annotations add the flexibility and natural expressiveness of pen and paper, but sacrifice some of the structure inherent to annotations created with mouse and keyboard. For instance, current ink annotation systems do not anchor the ink so that it can be logically reflowed as the document is resized or edited. If digital ink annotations do not reflovv to keep up with the portions of the document they are annotating, the ink can become meaningless or even misleading. In this paper, we describe an approach to recognizing digital ink annotations to infer this structure, restoring the strengths of more structured digital annotations to a preferable freeform medium. Our solution is easily extensible to support new annotation types and allows us to efficiently resolve ambiguities between different annotation elements in real-time. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

Discerning structure from freeform handwritten notes

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reflowing digital ink annotations

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From personal to shared annotations

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Freeform digital ink annotations in electronic documents: A systematic mapping study

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning physics through online video annotations

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Document image analysis for active reading

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shilman, M., & Wei, Z. (2004). Recognizing freeform digital ink annotations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3163, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28640-0_30

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

63%

Materials Science 1

13%

Chemistry 1

13%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free