Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes

221Citations
Citations of this article
298Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide the best evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions including quality improvement strategies. The methods of systematic review of individual patient randomised trials of healthcare interventions are well developed. We discuss methodological and practice issues that need to be considered when undertaking systematic reviews of quality improvement strategies including developing a review protocol, identifying and screening evidence sources, quality assessment and data abstraction, analytical methods, reporting systematic reviews, and appraising systematic reviews. This paper builds on our experiences within the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) review group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grimshaw, J., McAuley, L. M., Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Oxman, A. D., Ramsay, C., … Zwarenstein, M. (2003). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Quality and Safety in Health Care. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.4.298

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free