Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Fundus first or fundus last-which and why?

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Biliary tract injury represents the most serious and potentially life-threatening cholecystectomy complication. It is important to identify the structure of Calot's triangle during isolation of cystic duct to decrease this injury. Cystic duct isolation is the first dangerous technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Retrograde (fundus first) dissection is frequently used in open cholecystectomy and although feasible in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has not been widely practiced as the antegrade conventional one. This article is presented to show that retrograde method appears to be a safe procedure and does not compromise the conventional one. It should be tried if obscure anatomy should occur without proceeding to irreparable hemorrhage or biliary injury. If these do occur, conversion is always a viable choice and should not be deemed a failure. However, retrograde dissection remains to have its error trap that is mostly leading to vasculobiliary injuries as well as the drawback of retained GB stones tendency. Abbreviations: OC: Open cholecystectomy, LC: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, RLC: Retrograde laparoscopic cholecystectomy, CLC: Conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, GB: Gallbladder, CBD: Common bile duct, CHD: Common hepatic duct, IOC: Intraoperative cholangiography, ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. © Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barham, M. (2011). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Fundus first or fundus last-which and why? World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10007-1112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free