The recent AIPLA meeting’s new trend as to nationwide §101-guidelines and the “invention description language, IDL” ─ Trivializing using ETCIs’ FSTP-tests

Abstract

AIPLA 2017 Spring Conference turned out to be the most interesting event by AIPLA’s standing, especially as to the IDL. This paper upfront confirms the truth of this assumption: The event provided the best survey/comment up to now concerning the recent nationwide §101/Alice-guidelines and similar international developments. Section 2 namely reports that the AIPLA 2017 Spring Conference was the first internationally attended meeting of the large expert community of 35 USC Substantive Patent Law (“SPL”) that in several panels showed the by now vastly stabilized understanding of the Supreme Court’s Alice decisioncomplained of the still total helplessness as to an urgently needed key to ─ or, to the point: ‘clou’ of ─ the Supreme Court’s Alice analysis, i.e. its MBA-framework, which would clearly/convincingly, totally robustly, and broadly acceptably separate patent-eligible (“PE”) from nPE inventions. But this ‘clou’ exists, even a ‘big clou’, as the latter enables by IDL for any ETCI to prove rationally & mathematically •trivially and •semi-automatically its totally robust SPL satisfaction (comprising its PE).