The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable

38Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is shown that the Majoritarian Compromise of Sertel (1986) is subgame-perfect implementable on the domain of strict preference profiles, although it fails to be Maskin-monotonic and is hence not implementable in Nash equilibrium. The Majoritarian Compromise is Pareto-optimal and obeys SNIP (strong no imposition power), i.e. never chooses a strict majority's worst candidate. In fact, it is "majoritarian approving" i.e. it always picks "what's good for a majority" (alternatives which some majority regards as among the better "effective" half of the available alternatives). Thus, being Pareto-optimal and majoritarian approving, it is majoritarian-optimal. Finally, the Majoritarian Compromise is measured against various criteria, such as consistency and Condorcet-consistency. © Springer-Verlag 1999.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sertel, M. R., & Yilmaz, B. (1999). The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable. Social Choice and Welfare, 16(4), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003550050164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free