SEEG in 3D: Interictal Source Localization From Intracerebral Recordings

Abstract

Background: Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) uses a three-dimensional configuration of depth electrodes to localize epileptiform activity, but traditional analysis of SEEG is spatially restricted to the point locations of the electrode contacts. Interpolation of brain activity between contacts might allow for three-dimensional representation of epileptiform activity and avoid pitfalls of SEEG interpretation. Objective: The goal of this study was to validate SEEG-based interictal source localization and assess the ability of this technique to monitor far-field activity in non-implanted brain regions. Methods: Interictal epileptiform discharges were identified on SEEG in 26 patients who underwent resection, ablation, or disconnection of the suspected epileptogenic zone. Dipoles without (free) and with (scan) gray matter restriction, and current density (sLORETA and SWARM methods), were calculated using a finite element head model. Source localization results were compared to the conventional irritative zone (IZ) and the surgical treatment volumes (TV) of seizure-free vs. non-seizure-free patients. Results: The median distance from dipole solutions to the nearest contact in the conventional IZ was 7 mm (interquartile range 4–15 mm for free dipoles and 4–14 mm for scan dipoles). The IZ modeled with SWARM predicted contacts within the conventional IZ with 83% (75–100%) sensitivity and 94% (88–100%) specificity. The proportion of current within the TV was greater in seizure-free patients (P = 0.04) and predicted surgical outcome with 45% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Dipole solutions and sLORETA results did not correlate with seizure outcome. Addition of scalp EEG led to more superficial modeled sources (P = 0.03) and negated the ability to predict seizure outcome (P = 0.23). Removal of near-field data from contacts within the TV resulted in smearing of the current distribution (P = 0.007) and precluded prediction of seizure freedom (P = 0.20). Conclusions: Source localization accurately represented interictal discharges from SEEG. The proportion of current within the TV distinguished between seizure-free and non-seizure-free patients when near-field recordings were obtained from the surgical target. The high prevalence of deep sources in this cohort likely obscured any benefit of concurrent scalp EEG. SEEG-based interictal source localization is useful in illustrating and corroborating the epileptogenic zone. Additional techniques are needed to localize far-field epileptiform activity from non-implanted brain regions.