Restoring nature in a mobile society

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drenthen explores interesting lines of argument within debates on nature restoration in the Netherlands. For this purpose he applies dichotomies such as locals versus visitors, ecocentrism versus anthropocentrism and nature-centered landscapes versus human-centered landscapes - dichotomies that are characteristic of nature conservation debates to date. In this commentary I will critique these dichotomies from a socio-cultural history perspective. Just as the activists in Drenthen's text emphasize the different layers of cultural history in our landscapes, I will highlight some of the socio-cultural layers in our visions of nature. After discussing these dichotomies, I will return to the issue of nature conservation to date, and present some thoughts on another key notion in Drenthen's argument: alienation from nature. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2009). Restoring nature in a mobile society. In New Visions of Nature: Complexity and Authenticity (pp. 229–236). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2611-8_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free