One-year change in diastolic blood pressure and aortic disease-related mortality in a japanese general population aged 50-75 years

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Aortic diseases (ADs), including aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, and aortic rupture, are fatal diseases with extremely high mortality rates. Hypertension has been reported to be associated with AD development; however, it remains unclear whether a 1-year change in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is a risk factor for AD-related mortality in the general population. Methods and Results: This study used a nationwide database of 235,076 individuals (aged 50-75 years) who participated in the annual "Specific Health Check and Guidance in Japan" for 2 consecutive years between 2008 and 2010. There were 55 AD-related deaths during the follow-up period of 1,770 days. All subjects were divided into 4 groups based on the baseline DBP and change in DBP at 1 year: Persistent high DBP, increasing DBP, decreasing DBP, and normal DBP. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the persistent high DBP group had the greatest risk among the 4 groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that both DBP and 1-year change in DBP were significantly associated with AD-related deaths. The prediction capacity was significantly improved by the addition of 1-year change in DBP to confounding risk factors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated for the first time that a 1-year change in DBP was associated with AD-related deaths in the general population. Monitoring changes in DBP are of critical importance in the primary prevention of AD-related deaths in apparently healthy subjects aged 50-75 years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otaki, Y., Watanabe, T., Konta, T., Watanabe, M., Fujimoto, S., Sato, Y., … Watanabe, T. (2021). One-year change in diastolic blood pressure and aortic disease-related mortality in a japanese general population aged 50-75 years. Circulation Journal, 85(12), 2222–2231. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0514

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free