Ethical, Legal and Risk Management Considerations in the Neuropsychological Assessment of Veterans

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the ethical and regulatory issues facing neuropsychologists practicing within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system, either as Veteran Health Administration neuropsychologists or as consultants. The focus is proactive, with an emphasis on preparation consistent with a positive approach to ethical practice and risk management. Given the sheer magnitude of applicable Federal regulations and guidelines, the scope is limited to an overview of select ethical complexities involved in the professional practice of neuropsychology with veterans within VA settings. The article uses a top-down structure, with each section (a) identifying the relevant core biomedical ethical principles, followed by (b) an elaboration of the relevant ethical requirements as defined by the American Psychological Association's Code of Ethics, and (c) applicable Federal regulations. Suggestions for translating core ethical principles and relevant ethical requirements into pragmatic action consistent with Federal regulation follow. Topics include (a) establishing professional competence, (b) understanding the type of assessment, (c) understanding consent requirements, and (d) understanding the ethical and regulatory issues in assessing veteran symptom presentation. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russo, A. C. (2013). Ethical, Legal and Risk Management Considerations in the Neuropsychological Assessment of Veterans. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9145-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free