A case study on the improvement of institution of "High-Risk High-Return R & D" in Korea

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite the increase of government spending on R & D in South Korea, there have been limits in enhancing the challenging trait and creativity of research outcomes. A new approach to the current mode of R & D is considered necessary to tackle this problem. In 2015, South Korea operated fifteen programs, namely "High-risk Highreturn R & D," from seven government ministries. The purpose of this study is to examine the actual conditions for adoption and to further promote early establishment and wide implementation of the new "High-risk High-return policy" in National R & D, and to suggest ways to improve it. In this study, we have approached the case with a life-cycle perspective of planmanagement- evaluation of R & D by carrying out a survey and unstandardized interviews with key staff from R & D management agencies. Based on the results of the analysis, we suggest improvements in three aspects: 1) flexible system operation, 2) government ministries' autonomy and accountability, 3) effective incentives. Finally, we discuss possible improvements, future directions, and the limits of this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, B. Y., Jun, H. J., Chang, M. H., & Kim, D. C. (2017). A case study on the improvement of institution of “High-Risk High-Return R & D” in Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0069-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free